It is added rather than substituted. In ordinary practice a client continues their medication and their psychotherapy through a course of neuromodulation, and for clients aged 15 to 21 the relevant FDA clearances are adjunct clearances, meaning concurrent treatment is part of the cleared use rather than an option. The manufacturer’s own guidance is that patients do not need to stop medication or therapy to receive Deep TMS.
Two practical principles follow. Hold the other variables steady during the acute course where clinically safe, because changing medication mid-course makes it impossible to attribute any improvement afterward. And plan for what happens when the course ends, since durability data show most acute responders maintain benefit over a year while a substantial minority of the wider cohort need retreatment, under a regimen that included continuing antidepressant medication.
For the age group most relevant to emerging adult practice, concurrent treatment is built into the clearance. The FDA cleared the NeuroStar Advanced Therapy System as an adjunct for the treatment of major depressive disorder in adolescent patients aged 15 to 21 in March 2024.1 BrainsWay announced a comparable label expansion for Deep TMS as adjunct therapy for adolescent patients aged 15 to 21 in November 2025.2
Adjunct means alongside something else. A referring clinician who assumes their role ends at the referral has misread the arrangement for these clients, because the clearance itself presumes ongoing treatment. That is worth saying plainly to a client who has interpreted the referral as a sign that therapy has failed.
Manufacturer guidance is direct on this point. BrainsWay states that patients do not need to stop medication or psychotherapy during Deep TMS, and that treatment can be delivered in combination with either.3 That is a claim about compatibility rather than about efficacy, and it is the question clients actually ask.
The durability evidence rests on the same assumption. A multisite naturalistic observational study following patients with pharmacoresistant major depressive disorder after acute TMS found that among 120 patients who responded or remitted, 62.5 percent continued to meet response criteria throughout a one-year follow-up. Across the full 257-patient follow-up cohort, responders and non-responders together, 36.2 percent received reintroduction of TMS during that period, averaging 16.2 treatment days. The follow-up was conducted under a pragmatic regimen of continuation antidepressant medication with access to retreatment.4
Read that carefully with a client. Most people who respond hold their response for a year. A meaningful minority need another course. And the maintenance picture that produced those numbers included staying on medication, so a client planning to stop everything after a successful course is not planning for the conditions the evidence describes.
There is a mechanistic rationale for continuing therapy rather than pausing it. A large naturalistic study of simultaneous rTMS and psychotherapy in major depressive disorder reported a response rate of 66.3 percent and a remission rate of 56.0 percent among 196 patients, with 60 percent of remitters sustaining remission at six-month follow-up. The authors argued that stimulation and psychotherapy target overlapping networks through different pathways, both inducing change through neuroplasticity, and hypothesized that simultaneous application could produce more robust and prolonged effects than either alone.5
Those figures require a caveat that a client will not supply for themselves. That study was naturalistic and uncontrolled, so its rates are not comparable to the sham-controlled trial figures used to support clearances, and the absence of a control group means the combination cannot be said to outperform either component. The defensible statement is that combining them is clinically coherent and widely practiced, not that combination is proven superior.
The most useful thing a referring clinician can do during a course is resist changing anything else. If medication is adjusted in week two and the client improves in week four, nobody can say what worked, and the client will be left without a clear answer about what to maintain afterward.
Where a medication change is clinically necessary, it should happen and it should be documented with dates so the treating team can interpret the course afterward. The principle is not that nothing may change. It is that changes should be deliberate, minimal and recorded rather than incidental.
Yellowbrick provides neuroscience technologies and neuromodulation services through an agreement with its sister company Synchrony Brain Health, whose outpatient services include Deep TMS and neurofeedback alongside psychotherapy services, and Yellowbrick’s own approach integrates neuroscience with psychiatric and family treatment. Where prescribing, therapy and neuromodulation sit in different organizations, agreeing in advance who holds the medication decisions during a course prevents the coordination gap that otherwise appears around week three.
| Element | What normally happens | What to watch |
|---|---|---|
| Psychotherapy | Usually continues throughout the course | Watch for a client reframing therapy as redundant now that a procedure is involved |
| Medication | Usually continues, and the durability evidence assumes continuation | Avoid non-essential changes during the acute course, and document any change with dates |
| Prescriber relationship | Continues, and should be explicitly named as ongoing | Confirm the prescriber knows the course has started and when it ends |
| Symptom monitoring | Continues, ideally with the same measure used before the course | Use one consistent measure so change is interpretable |
| Substance use and sleep | Continue to be clinically relevant throughout | These shift during a multi-week course and can affect both safety and response |
| Expectations about ending | Plan before the course finishes rather than after | About a third of the full follow-up cohort was retreated within a year in the durability study |
| Role of the referring clinician | Continues, and is presumed by adjunct clearances for ages 15 to 21 | Say this to the client, who may read the referral as therapy having failed |
Neuromodulation is added to a treatment plan rather than swapped into it. For clients aged 15 to 21 the relevant clearances are adjunct clearances, so concurrent treatment is part of the cleared use. Medication and therapy normally continue, and manufacturer guidance is explicit that neither needs to stop. The durability evidence was generated under continuation medication. Hold other variables steady during the acute course so that any improvement can be attributed, and document any change that is clinically necessary. Plan the ending before the course finishes: most acute responders maintained response over a year, while about a third of the full follow-up cohort was retreated. Frame combination as clinically coherent rather than as proven superior, since the strongest combination data come from uncontrolled naturalistic studies.
This article is general guidance for referring clinicians. It is not a substitute for individual clinical judgment or an individualized assessment and it does not constitute medical advice. Do not start, stop or adjust any medication on the basis of this article. Medication decisions rest with the prescriber and treatment decisions rest with the treating service. Study results describe populations and do not predict outcomes for any individual. FDA clearances are device-specific and indication-specific and change over time, so confirm current clearance and protocol directly with the service.
If a client is in immediate danger, direct them to emergency services. The 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline provides free, confidential crisis support 24 hours a day, seven days a week, by call or text to 988.6
Learn more about Yellowbrick Consultation and Treatment Center on Google.
Yellowbrick collaborates with adolescents and emerging adults, ages 16-30's, their families and participating professionals toward the development and implementation of a strategic “Life Plan.” An integrative, multi-specialty consultation clarifies strengths, limitations, and risks, and defines motivations, goals and choices.
A mental health condition that’s characterized by intense shifts in mood including both manic and depressive episodes.
People living with Major Depressive Disorder, or MDD, experience episodes of depression and sadness that are debilitating to daily life.
Those living with anxiety disorders experience high levels of anxiety and stress that interfere negatively with daily life.
These individuals often experience an extended period of anxiety and disruption as the young person ages out of the structured support settings available through the educational and social services systems.
A mental health issue in which a person’s cognitive function is impaired, resulting in symptoms like experiencing challenges with conducting speech, reading and writing, and behavior.
Mental health disorders that negatively affect a person’s behaviors, thought patterns, and function. People diagnosed with these disorders experience challenges with managing relationships and understanding various situations.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is a mental health condition that people can develop as a result of experiencing traumatic situations, characterized by symptoms including flashbacks, avoidance behaviors, and more.
A mental health condition that is characterized by specific symptoms of forgetfulness and lack of concentration, which makes it challenging to complete necessary tasks.
Mental health conditions that interfere with a person’s eating habits, thought patterns, and behaviors in negative ways.
A mental health disorder diagnosable with the DSM-5 that is characterized by both obsessions and compulsive behaviors.
We are committed to the developing specialized services for adopted emerging adults and their families.